Visit Tasha's Web site



Visit Jennie's Web site



Visit Laura's Web site

a.k.a. Elizabeth Lynn Casey



Visit Regina's Web site



Visit Diana's Web site



Visit Sara's Web site

  • Renee Rosen
  • Off The Page
  • Alexandra Sokoloff
  • Tess Gerritsen
  • Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
  • Refrigerator Door
  • Laurie R. King -- Mutterings
  • A Dark Planet
  • Elizabeth Peters
  • Heather Webber
  • Kill Zone Authors
  • Grace Notes
  • Killer Year
  • Miss Snark
  • Southern Comfort
  • J.T. Ellison
  • Rosett Writes Blog
  • Edwardian State of Mind
  • Galleycat
  • Tim Maleeny
  • Murder She Writes
  • Murderati
  • First Offenders
  • Naked Authors
  • The Little Blog of Murder
  • A Newbie's Guide to Publishing
  • Book Square
  • Debutante Ball
  • Reviewed by Liz
  • What Fresh Hell is This?
  • Book Daddy
  • The Lipstick Chronicles
  • Judy Merrill Larson
  • The Girl Detective Blog
  • Cozy Chicks Blog
  • The Sphere
  • Anatomy of a Book Deal
  • Contemporary Nomad
  • Surrounded on Three Sides
  • Bookseller Chick
  • Overboard
  • Poisoned Pen Letters
  • Meritorious Mysteries
  • Will Bereswill's blog
  • Julia Buckley
  • Femmes Fatales
  • Amelia Peabody
  • uberlonelyguy16
  • Sarah Stewart Taylor
  • The Outfit
  • My Bookmark is in:












      View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
    Polls Archive

    Archives by Month
    Archives by Author
    Design by
    DreamForge Media

    Meta:
    RSS 2.0
    Comments RSS 2.0
    Valid XHTML
    WP

    The slings and arrows

    Diana Killian Icon

    I was browsing M.J. Rose’s Buzz, Balls & Hype blog the other day. It was the “Doctor is In” segment, and a writer was agonizing over just receiving his fifteenth glowing rejection letter from an editor.

    Fifteen, I think you’ll agree, is not a lot compared to some of the stories we hear. But this writer is in the unusual position of being championed by another bestselling writer, and apparently all the rejection letters have been glowing in the extreme.

    And yet, the old cash register keeps popping up with that NO SALE button.

    And so the writer is doing what writers typically do when rejected–no, not drinking, eating chocolate to excess, posting wild and bitter diatribes on message boards (at least, I don’t think so). No. He’s second-guessing himself. Perhaps if he took the substance out of his work…

    Perhaps. Who knows? Apparently all these glowing rejection letters didn’t have any practical advice, and that is always crazy-making.

    Not that the alternative would help, because very often rejection letters flat out contradict each other. Proving, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that there are still waaaay too many people involved in publishing. Once we get a computer that can calculate all the market factors in and do the actual manuscript acquiring, then maybe this industry will be properly run.

    This is not only a brutal business, it is a wildly subjective business. And half the methods and means of tracking the all-mighty sales figures are anything but state of the art. Pawing through tea leaves might be just as effective. Maybe more so. That’s because the publishing biz only got serious about tracking numbers relatively recently. This used to be a gentleman’s game, but that was before my time. And since I’m no gentleman, probably just as well. But one cannot help but regret that kinder and gentler era of publishing when there were enough editors to go around, and a genre writer might actually have more than two or three books (with a three-month shelf life) to prove herself.

    Usually when I see these despondent letters from frustrated writers I can sort of read between the lines. Writers are very good at kidding themselves about how fabulous their own work is, but fifteen glowing rejection letters are still fifteen glowing rejection letters, and presumably the book is good but not commercial.

    And perhaps the mistake is that it is being pitched to major houses where commercial counts.

    The times they are a changin’, and in order to survive in this business (by which I mean, stay sane enough to keep producing books), you’ve got to be able to roll with the punches. When one door closes, you’ve got to pick the lock of the next one. Failing that, you’ve got to be prepared to kick the door in. There is no waiting for another door to swing open–and even if there were, there’s already a crowd gathered in front of it.

    These days it’s all about Plan B.

    So the question this morning is, how many rejections did you swallow before you got your a) agent and/or b) first book sold?

    And if the current contract goes south, do you have a Plan B?

    11 Responses to “The slings and arrows”

    1. I don’t remember how many rejections I got for Beneath A Panamanian Moon and if I hadn’t gone with my own Plan B and published a few short stories here and there, primarily in EQMM, I might still be unpublished.

      But when I did sell BAPM, here’s what I wrote on the invitation to the publication party:

      12 Years
      5 Major Rewrites
      4 Agents
      3 Titles
      And 1 Damn Good Reason to Party.

      I know second-guessing and it hurts like hell. But you can’t quit. The only guarantee in this business is that you won’t publish it if you don’t send it out.

      Never give up. Never.

      by David Terrenoire on March 12th, 2007 at 6:02 am

    2. 15 rejection letters? He’s just getting started! The invitation to my launch party (a take-off on a birth announcement) listed a gestation period of 7 years. I left off the 300+ rejection letters I amassed from agents over the years (I clearly needed to work on my query letter!). But, once you find that perfect agent (which I did with the help of an intro from an editor I’d worked with at an Iowa workshop), it’s worth it. She encouraged me when we got a few (maybe 5? I forget, now) rejections from editors. Because, just like finding the perfect agent, once you find the perfect editor, you forget all the rejection crap (to bring the birth analogy back, it’s like how you forget those labor pains once you’re holding that beautiful new baby!).

      by judy larsen on March 12th, 2007 at 8:53 am

    3. I was, at first, one of those obnoxious writers who got her agent on the second query. I thought that was how it went for just about everyone who has written something decent. I fully expected publication would be only a few months away.

      Wrong.

      Not only wasn’t I going to see a book on the shelves mere months from then, but I wouldn’t even go on submission and I’d end up dropping the agent and, over the next five years or so, writing two or three more manuscripts before I even got another agent (and this after at least four dozen queries and two contest mentions/wins!)

      It’s like I always have said, I might not have gotten into this “biz” if I had known how difficult and heart-wrenching it would be, despite a love of the writing part. Hopefully, the next weeks will see it all bear fruit and I’ll quickly forget those labor pains, as Judy put it so well.

      I think I’ll always have the stretch marks, though.

      And, Diana, Plan B would be starting my own publication company - and not one of the “all I publish is my own stuff” ones. I’d love to work with other authors - I hear they’re such great people. :wink:

      by Regina Harvey on March 12th, 2007 at 12:56 pm

    4. I’m chiming in to simply say this was a great post, Diana!

      by Laura on March 12th, 2007 at 5:12 pm

    5. Hey, David, but no one’s counting, right? The launch party invite says it all.

      by Diana Killian on March 12th, 2007 at 7:36 pm

    6. Judy, this is the very thing I reassure myself (and everyone who will listen) with. It only takes one “yes” to erase a hunded rejections.

      by Diana Killian on March 12th, 2007 at 7:38 pm

    7. Stop frightening the wee ones. Regina. Allow them to believe (at least for a few minutes) that getting an agent actually solves one or two problems. :P

      And, in fact, it generally does. It’s getting PUBLISHED that starts all the trouble.

      by Diana Killian on March 12th, 2007 at 7:39 pm

    8. Thanks, Laura. Rejection does seem to be the flavor of the month. Maybe it has to do with the pollen in the air.

      by Diana Killian on March 12th, 2007 at 7:41 pm

    9. Well then we need April to hurry up, darn it!

      by Laura on March 12th, 2007 at 8:43 pm

    10. It’s not enough to have written a good book. the good book has to get into the hands of the right person at the right time.
      Now who is the right person, and when is the right time? There’s no way to tell ahead of time. But if you don’t keep submitting work, you’ll never know.

      by J.D. Rhoades on March 12th, 2007 at 10:16 pm

    11. J.D., that’s the truth–and that’s where the element of luck comes in. No one wants to believe that luck will determine his future. We all want to believe we can control our fates by hard work and living right.

      Okay, by hard work, anyway.

      by Diana Killian on March 13th, 2007 at 11:44 am

    Leave a Reply

    :) :D :( :o 8O :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: